編者按：日前，國(guó)際電力行業(yè)知名刊物《Power》刊登題為“模塊化發(fā)電廠正在提高肯尼亞地?zé)嵝省钡奈恼?，向全球介紹我集團(tuán)首創(chuàng)的地?zé)峋陔娬炯夹g(shù)及其成就。這是繼新華社、《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》等中國(guó)央媒介紹開(kāi)山在肯尼亞取得的成就之后，又一個(gè)國(guó)際級(jí)媒體的推介。
《Power Magazine》在全球電力行業(yè)具有顯著的影響力。作為全球最古老的能源行業(yè)期刊之一，自1882年創(chuàng)刊以來(lái)，已成為電力行業(yè)內(nèi)的重要信息來(lái)源和行業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。其影響力既源于權(quán)威性和歷史性，還因?yàn)槠鋼碛袕V泛的受眾群體，讀者涵蓋了全球電力行業(yè)專業(yè)人士，包括電力工程師、運(yùn)營(yíng)經(jīng)理、技術(shù)專家、決策者和企業(yè)高管，它通過(guò)提供深入的技術(shù)分析、案例研究和行業(yè)新聞，幫助專業(yè)人士做出更好的決策和理解行業(yè)動(dòng)態(tài)?！禤ower Magazine》在全球電力行業(yè)扮演重要的角色，既是信息傳播的重要渠道，也是行業(yè)趨勢(shì)和技術(shù)發(fā)展的風(fēng)向標(biāo)，該刊物宣介開(kāi)山地?zé)峋谀K電站技術(shù)標(biāo)志著我集團(tuán)擁有自主知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的核心技術(shù)得到業(yè)內(nèi)主流媒體的認(rèn)同，也料將極大地推動(dòng)開(kāi)山技術(shù)在全球的應(yīng)用。
下面是本編輯部轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)的新聞鏈接和轉(zhuǎn)載文章的中英文對(duì)照文本，以饗讀者。
原文鏈接：https://www.powermag.com/a-modular-power-plant-is-steaming-up-kenyas-geothermal-efficiency/
A Modular Power Plant Is Steaming Up Kenya's Geothermal Efficiency
Sosian Menegai during the commissioning phase. Courtesy: Kaishan Group
Sosian Menengai Geothermal Power, Kenya’s newest geothermal power plant, is powered by modular technology that maximizes efficiency, reduces costs, and enhances scalability.
Kenya’s scenic Rift Valley region is a literal hotbed of geothermal potential. Part of the vast East African Rift Valley System (EARS), a 6,400-kilometer (km) tectonic divergence that is cleaving the African continent into two plates, Kenya’s Rift Valley forms a vertical corridor of intensive faulting and volcanic activity, hot springs, fumaroles, and sulfur-oozing fissures. But while the country began geothermal exploration for power development in the 1950s, most of its investments have been focused on the Olkaria region situated within Hell’s Gate National Park near the flamingo-flecked Lake Naivasha in Nakuru County. Five of six geothermal power stations in Olkaria are owned by KenGen (with a combined capacity of 799 MW), while Nevada-based Ormat Technologies owns a 150-MW plant. Olkaria plants in 2023 provided nearly 45% of Kenya’s total generation, a sizeable contribution to the East African powerhouse’s meager 3.3-GW installed capacity.
In 2008, the Geothermal Development Co. (GDC), a state-owned special-purpose vehicle tasked with accelerating the nation’s geothermal resource development, expanded its focus to the Menengai region just north of Olkaria, at the site of a massive shield volcano with one of the biggest calderas in the world. While GDC says the Menengai complex harbors a potential of 1,600 MW, its long-term goal is to develop 465 MW of geothermal steam equivalent.
In 2013, it took the first step to competitively award the first three initial 35-MW power projects at the complex to three independent power producers (IPPs): Orpower 22 (a former subsidiary of New York firm Symbion now owned by China’s Kaishan Group), South African-based Quantum Power East Africa (now majority owned by UK firm Globeleq), and Nairobi-headquartered Sosian Energy. In August 2023, the first of these projects—Menengai III, now formally known as the Sosian Menengai Geothermal Power—wrapped up a 16-month construction timeframe and began delivering first power to the grid.
Map showing location of geothermal area along the Kenyan Rift Valley. Courtesy: KenGen
A Technology Breakthrough
Sosian’s condensed timeframe is especially stunning given that traditional geothermal development can exceed seven years. This is owing in part to a complex process that involves drilling and testing multiple wells, selecting a centralized power plant location, ordering steam turbines, and constructing extensive steam collection and reinjection systems. The traditional approach is also ridden with risks, including significant delays and inefficiencies, such as energy losses from steam pressure drops, thermal losses over long distances, and the underutilization of wells with varying pressures.
Sosian, to some measure, had the benefit of the GDC’s public-private partnership model for developing Menengai, under which the GDC assumes upfront risks of geothermal development. The state company has also notably set out to develop the field in five phases, starting with a 105-MW “steam sales” model, where it supplies steam from drilled wells to the power plants via a 25-km steam gathering and piping system. As of 2023, GDC had drilled 53 wells with a potential of 169 MW.
However, the power plant’s success can also be attributed to a distinctive new geothermal development process introduced by China’s Kaishan Group. Dr. Tang Yan, general manager of Kaishan Group, recalled realizing the need for a dramatic shift at a 2015 geothermal conference in Melbourne, Australia, where experts discussed the pitfalls of conventional methods. “I said, ‘Why don’t you put a power plant on the wellhead and do it phase by phase?’ ” he recounted.
Overcoming Traditional Challenges
While the approach proposed to support incremental power production from the start while providing revenue to support future project expansion, Yan learned no technology to support the approach was commercially available. Kaishan, which had then already begun its transition from a giant Shanghai-headquartered air compressor maker to a diversified global company, jumped into action to leverage its 2012-developed Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) expander and screw steam expander technologies.
The technologies—originally developed for waste heat recovery from refineries and steel mills—allowed Kaishan to optimize geothermal power generation by maximizing energy output from varying well conditions, reducing inefficiencies, and enabling the development of four types of decentralized, modular power plants that are quicker to deploy and more adaptable to different geothermal fields, Yan told POWER. “These modular power plants include the steam screw expander modular power plants, the steam ORC modular power plants, the brine ORC modular power plants, and the steam and brine dual resource modular power plants,” he explained.
Steam screw expanders are specifically designed to handle wet or saturated steam, which is common in geothermal wells, effectively extracting energy from a wider range of well conditions, including wells with high non-condensable gas (NCG) content that may not be suitable for traditional turbines. ORC systems, meanwhile, are adept at converting lower-temperature steam and brine—byproducts that would otherwise go to waste—into additional electricity, Yan said.
In addition, Kaishan’s modular plants can be used to form hybrid cycles or thermal systems to meet any production well conditions, maximize their power output, and eliminate low-head pressure (WHP) wasted wells or idling wells. Because the technologies can be adapted to specific geothermal resource conditions at different project sites, they can be tailored to provide stellar efficiency, he said. “We can improve the well thermal efficiency of, for example, medium enthalpy wells, to up to 18% and 19%,” he said. That compares to only 8% to 12% for traditional centralized power plants that only use single-flash steam, he noted.
he 35-MWe Sosian Menengai Geothermal Power plant was commissioned in August 2023. The plant uses two Kaishan geothermal steam counterpressure screw expanders, which discharge their exhausts into three Organic Rankine Cycle units. Courtesy: Kaishan Group
A Competitive Edge for New Geothermal Power
Kaishan quickly expanded the niche technology into a lucrative business. Since it put online the first of four phases of the 240-MW Sorik Marapi Geothermal Project in Indonesia in 2018, it has built the 10-MW Sokoria Geothermal, also in Indonesia, alongside projects in Turkey, the U.S., and Hungary. At Sosian, Kaishan’s first project in Kenya, the company served as the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractor.
According to Yan, Kaishan’s cost-effective price point proved a crucial selection advantage. Kaishan’s EPC contract is valued at $65 million, compared to a $108 million EPC contract recently awarded for Menengai II, one of the region’s three equally sized IPP projects. The price difference is rooted in the technology selection, Yan explained. While Sosian’s 35-MW project was designed as a centralized power plant, it is powered by two steam screw expanders and three wet steam ORC modular power plants.
However, GDC’s steam contains 3.3% NCG—which represents a “huge percentage,” he said. If Sosian used traditional steam turbines, they would need to expand steam at 6 bar absolute and then consume more then 30 tons of steam per hour to remove NCG using steam injectors and vacuum pumps. Instead, Sosian employs steam screw expanders and a bottom cycle to handle the saturated steam discharge, reducing the steam to atmospheric levels throughout the entire process while eliminating the parasitic power typically consumed by vacuum systems.
“The overall efficiency compared to a traditional steam turbine is a huge game changer for this site,” Yan said. “The project only needed a guarantee of 33.25 MW, and the target was 35 MW, but we’re actually generating 37 MW.” At the same time, the project doesn’t need to purchase the extra 10% of steam for a steam injector, putting less of a burden on the GDC, he said.
A Solution for Idled Wells
The modularity of the system also proved beneficial to speed up construction and, crucially, to overcome supply chain and project management challenges posed by the COVID pandemic, Yan said. Kaishan typically assembles the modules and conducts component testing in a factory setting over six to nine months, he said. “And then, when we ship to the site, usually it takes a very short time to put them together, and you don’t need to do any welding on the power modules,” he added. “That’s sometimes where quality control can be a challenge,” he noted.
The success of the Sosian Menegai project has so far sparked significant interest in Kenya’s geothermal industry, Yan said. A key reason is that Kenya has a lot of wells, and an estimated 25% to 30% of those wells may not be supported by a steam collection system, which is needed by centralized steam turbines. “They call them idled wells or wasted wells, and they sit there and do nothing,” even if it was costly to drill them, he said. “But our technology doesn’t have that limitation because we can use any good pressure, whether they can produce brine or steam.”
—Sonal Patel is a POWER senior editor (@sonalcpatel, @POWERmagazine).
中文翻譯稿
模塊化發(fā)電廠正在提高肯尼亞地?zé)嵝?/span>
調(diào)試階段的 Sosian Menegai。圖片來(lái)源：開(kāi)山集團(tuán)
肯尼亞最新的地?zé)岚l(fā)電廠 Sosian Menengai 地?zé)岚l(fā)電廠采用模塊化技術(shù)，可最大限度提高效率、降低成本并增強(qiáng)可擴(kuò)展性。
肯尼亞風(fēng)景秀麗的裂谷地區(qū)是地?zé)豳Y源的寶庫(kù)。肯尼亞裂谷是廣闊的東非大裂谷系統(tǒng) (EARS) 的一部分，東非大裂谷系統(tǒng)是一個(gè)長(zhǎng)達(dá) 6,400 公里的地質(zhì)構(gòu)造分叉，將非洲大陸一分為二?？夏醽喠压刃纬闪艘粋€(gè)垂直走廊，其中有密集的斷層和火山活動(dòng)、溫泉、噴氣孔和硫磺滲出的裂縫。盡管肯尼亞在 20 世紀(jì) 50 年代就開(kāi)始進(jìn)行地?zé)峥碧揭蚤_(kāi)發(fā)電力，但其大部分投資都集中在位于地獄之門(mén)國(guó)家公園內(nèi)的奧爾卡里亞地區(qū)，該公園靠近納庫(kù)魯縣火烈鳥(niǎo)點(diǎn)綴的納瓦沙湖。奧爾卡里亞的六座地?zé)岚l(fā)電站中有五座歸 KenGen 所有（總?cè)萘繛?799 兆瓦），而總部位于內(nèi)華達(dá)州的 Ormat Technologies擁有一座 150 兆瓦的發(fā)電站。到 2023 年，奧爾卡里亞 (Olkaria) 電廠將提供肯尼亞近 45% 的總發(fā)電量，為這個(gè)東非強(qiáng)國(guó)僅有的 3.3 吉瓦的裝機(jī)容量做出了巨大貢獻(xiàn)。
2008 年，地?zé)衢_(kāi)發(fā)公司 (GDC) 將重點(diǎn)擴(kuò)大到奧爾卡里亞以北的梅嫩蓋地區(qū)，該地區(qū)是一座巨大的盾形火山，擁有世界上最大的火山口之一。地?zé)衢_(kāi)發(fā)公司是一家國(guó)有特殊目的公司，其任務(wù)是加速該國(guó)的地?zé)豳Y源開(kāi)發(fā)。GDC 表示，梅嫩蓋綜合體蘊(yùn)藏著 1,600 兆瓦的地?zé)釢摿Γ溟L(zhǎng)期目標(biāo)是開(kāi)發(fā) 465 兆瓦的地?zé)嵴羝?dāng)量。
2013 年，該集團(tuán)邁出了第一步，通過(guò)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)方式將該綜合體中的前三個(gè) 35 兆瓦發(fā)電項(xiàng)目授予三家獨(dú)立電力供應(yīng)商 (IPP)：Orpower 22（前身為紐約 Symbion 公司的子公司，現(xiàn)歸中國(guó)開(kāi)山集團(tuán)所有）、總部位于南非的 Quantum Power East Africa（現(xiàn)由英國(guó)公司 Globeleq 控股）和總部位于內(nèi)羅畢的 Sosian Energy。2023 年 8 月，這些項(xiàng)目中的第一個(gè)項(xiàng)目——Menengai III（現(xiàn)正式稱為 Sosian Menengai 地?zé)岚l(fā)電項(xiàng)目）結(jié)束了為期 16 個(gè)月的建設(shè)工期，并開(kāi)始向電網(wǎng)輸送第一批電力。
地圖顯示了肯尼亞裂谷沿線地?zé)釁^(qū)的位置。圖片來(lái)源：KenGen
技術(shù)突破
鑒于傳統(tǒng)地?zé)衢_(kāi)發(fā)可能要耗時(shí)超過(guò)七年，Sosian 的縮短工期尤其令人震驚。這在一定程度上歸因于一個(gè)復(fù)雜的過(guò)程，包括鉆探和測(cè)試多個(gè)井、選擇集中發(fā)電廠位置、訂購(gòu)蒸汽渦輪機(jī)以及建造廣泛的蒸汽收集和再注入系統(tǒng)。傳統(tǒng)方法也充滿風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，包括嚴(yán)重的延誤和效率低下，例如蒸汽壓力下降造成的能量損失、長(zhǎng)距離熱損失以及壓力變化的井的利用不足。
在某種程度上，Sosian 受益于 GDC 開(kāi)發(fā) Menengai 的公私合作模式，根據(jù)該模式，GDC 承擔(dān)地?zé)衢_(kāi)發(fā)的前期風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。值得注意的是，這家國(guó)有公司還計(jì)劃分五個(gè)階段開(kāi)發(fā)該地?zé)崽铮紫炔捎?105 兆瓦的“蒸汽銷售”模式，通過(guò) 25 公里長(zhǎng)的蒸汽收集和管道系統(tǒng)將鉆井中的蒸汽供應(yīng)給發(fā)電廠。截至 2023 年，GDC 已鉆探了 53 口井，潛力為 169 兆瓦。
然而，該發(fā)電廠的成功也歸功于中國(guó)開(kāi)山集團(tuán)推出的獨(dú)特的新型地?zé)衢_(kāi)發(fā)工藝。開(kāi)山集團(tuán)總經(jīng)理湯炎博士回憶說(shuō)，他在 2015 年澳大利亞墨爾本舉行的地?zé)釙?huì)議上意識(shí)到需要進(jìn)行重大轉(zhuǎn)變，當(dāng)時(shí)專家們討論了傳統(tǒng)方法的缺陷。“我說(shuō)，‘你為什么不在井口建一個(gè)發(fā)電廠，分階段進(jìn)行呢？’”他回憶道。
克服傳統(tǒng)挑戰(zhàn)
雖然該方法從一開(kāi)始就提出支持增量發(fā)電，同時(shí)提供收入以支持未來(lái)的項(xiàng)目擴(kuò)展，但湯炎博士了解到，沒(méi)有支持該方法的技術(shù)可供商業(yè)使用。開(kāi)山當(dāng)時(shí)已經(jīng)開(kāi)始從一家總部位于上海的大型空氣壓縮機(jī)制造商轉(zhuǎn)型為一家多元化的全球性公司，并立即采取行動(dòng)，利用其 2012 年開(kāi)發(fā)的有機(jī)朗肯循環(huán) (ORC) 膨脹機(jī)和螺桿蒸汽膨脹機(jī)技術(shù)。
湯炎博士告訴《POWER》雜志，這些技術(shù)最初是為回收煉油廠和鋼廠的廢熱而開(kāi)發(fā)的，它使開(kāi)山公司能夠通過(guò)最大限度地提高不同井況下的能量輸出、減少低效率，以及開(kāi)發(fā)四種類型的分散式模塊化發(fā)電廠來(lái)優(yōu)化地?zé)岚l(fā)電，這些發(fā)電廠部署速度更快，更能適應(yīng)不同的地?zé)崽?/span>。 “這些模塊化發(fā)電廠包括蒸汽螺桿膨脹機(jī)模塊化發(fā)電廠、蒸汽 ORC 模塊化發(fā)電廠、鹽水 ORC 模塊化發(fā)電廠以及蒸汽和鹽水雙資源模塊化發(fā)電廠，”他解釋說(shuō)。
蒸汽螺桿膨脹機(jī)專門(mén)設(shè)計(jì)用于處理地?zé)峋谐Ｒ?jiàn)的濕蒸汽或飽和蒸汽，可有效從各種井況中提取能量，包括可能不適合傳統(tǒng)渦輪機(jī)的不凝性氣體 (NCG)含量高的井。與此同時(shí)，ORC 系統(tǒng)擅長(zhǎng)將低溫蒸汽和鹽水（否則這些副產(chǎn)品將被浪費(fèi)）轉(zhuǎn)化為額外的電能，湯炎博士說(shuō)。
此外，開(kāi)山的模塊化電廠可用于形成混合循環(huán)或熱力系統(tǒng)，以滿足任何生產(chǎn)井條件，最大限度地提高其發(fā)電量，并消除低壓 (WHP) 浪費(fèi)井或閑置井。他說(shuō)，由于這些技術(shù)可以適應(yīng)不同項(xiàng)目地點(diǎn)的特定地?zé)豳Y源條件，因此可以量身定制以提供卓越的效率。他說(shuō)：“我們可以將中焓井的熱效率提高到 18% 和 19%?！彼赋?，相比之下，僅使用單次閃蒸蒸汽的傳統(tǒng)集中式發(fā)電廠的熱效率僅為 8% 至 12%。
35 MWe 的 Sosian Menengai 地?zé)岚l(fā)電廠于 2023 年 8 月投入使用。該電廠使用兩臺(tái)開(kāi)山地?zé)嵴羝磯郝輻U膨脹機(jī)，將廢氣排放到三個(gè)有機(jī)朗肯循環(huán)裝置中。圖片來(lái)源：開(kāi)山集團(tuán)
新地?zé)岚l(fā)電的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)
開(kāi)山迅速將這項(xiàng)小眾技術(shù)拓展為一項(xiàng)利潤(rùn)豐厚的業(yè)務(wù)。自2018 年在印度尼西亞投產(chǎn) 240 兆瓦 Sorik Marapi 地?zé)犴?xiàng)目四期工程中的第一期以來(lái)，該公司已在印度尼西亞建造了 10 兆瓦的 Sokoria 地?zé)犴?xiàng)目，此外還在土耳其、美國(guó)和匈牙利開(kāi)展了項(xiàng)目。Sosian是開(kāi)山在肯尼亞的第一個(gè)地?zé)犴?xiàng)目，公司擔(dān)任工程、采購(gòu)和施工 (EPC) 承包商。
湯炎博士表示，開(kāi)山電廠具有成本效益的價(jià)格點(diǎn)是其關(guān)鍵的選擇優(yōu)勢(shì)。開(kāi)山電廠的 EPC 合同價(jià)值 6500 萬(wàn)美元，而該地區(qū)三個(gè)同等規(guī)模的 IPP 項(xiàng)目之一 Menengai II 最近獲得的 EPC 合同價(jià)值 1.08 億美元。湯炎博士解釋說(shuō)，價(jià)格差異的根源在于技術(shù)選擇。雖然 Sosian 的 35 兆瓦項(xiàng)目設(shè)計(jì)為集中式發(fā)電廠，但它由兩個(gè)蒸汽螺桿膨脹機(jī)和三個(gè)濕蒸汽 ORC 模塊化發(fā)電廠提供動(dòng)力。
然而，GDC 的蒸汽含有 3.3% 的 NCG，這是一個(gè)“巨大的百分比”，他說(shuō)。如果 Sosian 使用傳統(tǒng)的蒸汽輪機(jī)，他們需要將蒸汽膨脹至 6 bar 絕對(duì)壓力，然后每小時(shí)消耗超過(guò) 30 噸的蒸汽，使用蒸汽噴射器和真空泵去除 NCG。相反，Sosian 使用蒸汽螺桿膨脹機(jī)和底部循環(huán)來(lái)處理飽和蒸汽排放，在整個(gè)過(guò)程中將蒸汽降低到大氣水平，同時(shí)消除真空系統(tǒng)通常消耗的寄生功率。
“與傳統(tǒng)蒸汽輪機(jī)相比，整體效率對(duì)于該站點(diǎn)來(lái)說(shuō)是一個(gè)巨大的改變，”湯炎博士說(shuō)道?！霸擁?xiàng)目只需要保證 33.25 兆瓦，目標(biāo)是 35 兆瓦，但我們實(shí)際上發(fā)電量為 37 兆瓦。”同時(shí)，該項(xiàng)目不需要額外購(gòu)買10%的蒸汽用于蒸汽噴射器，從而減輕了GDC的負(fù)擔(dān)，他說(shuō)。
閑置地?zé)峋慕鉀Q方案
湯炎博士表示，該系統(tǒng)的模塊化設(shè)計(jì)也有利于加快施工速度，更重要的是，有助于克服新冠疫情帶來(lái)的供應(yīng)鏈和項(xiàng)目管理挑戰(zhàn)。他說(shuō)，開(kāi)山通常會(huì)在六到九個(gè)月的時(shí)間內(nèi)組裝模塊并在工廠環(huán)境中進(jìn)行組件測(cè)試?！叭缓?，當(dāng)我們運(yùn)送到現(xiàn)場(chǎng)時(shí)，通常只需很短的時(shí)間即可將它們組裝在一起，并且您無(wú)需對(duì)電源模塊進(jìn)行任何焊接，”他補(bǔ)充道?！坝袝r(shí)，質(zhì)量控制可能是一個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)，”他指出。
他還說(shuō)，Sosian Menegai 項(xiàng)目的成功迄今已引起人們對(duì)肯尼亞地?zé)岙a(chǎn)業(yè)的極大興趣。一個(gè)關(guān)鍵原因是肯尼亞有很多井，估計(jì)其中 25% 到 30% 的井可能沒(méi)有蒸汽收集系統(tǒng)，而蒸汽收集系統(tǒng)是集中式蒸汽渦輪機(jī)所必需的?！八麄兎Q這些井為閑置井或廢棄井，它們就放在那里，什么也不做”，即使鉆探這些井的成本很高，“但我們的技術(shù)沒(méi)有這種限制，因?yàn)槲覀兛梢允褂萌魏瘟己玫膲毫?，無(wú)論它們是產(chǎn)生鹽水還是蒸汽?！?/span>
— Sonal Patel 是 POWER 的高級(jí)編輯（@sonalcpatel, @POWERmagazine）